A Year Later, AP Reporter Recalls Origins of Ferguson Movement

A year ago, most Americans had never heard of the St. Louis suburb called Ferguson. But after a white police officer fatally shot a black 18-year-old in the street, the name of the middle-class community became virtually a household word. From the first hours after Michael Brown’s death, Associated Press reporter Jim Salter watched as a neighborhood protest launched a national movement.

Aug. 9 marks the one-year anniversary of the fatal shooting. In “Deadly Force: Confrontations with the Police,” newly published by AP, learn how events in Ferguson and recent confrontations between the police and public have shaped reporting. The new book includes a first-person account of the unrest in Ferguson by Jim Salter, who covered the story (www.ap.org/books). Below is a excerpt from “Deadly Force: Confrontations with the Police,” accompanied by photos from the book depicting the movement that grew from Ferguson’s shooting:  

 

Until August 2014, Ferguson, Missouri, wasn’t the kind of place that generated much news. It was a mostly quiet suburban town of 21,000, a mix of beautiful old homes and working-class neighborhoods. Like a lot of communities in north St. Louis County, it had seen significant white flight and was now two-thirds African-American.



My wife’s grandmother lived in Ferguson until she died in 1991, so I spent some time there as a young man. But since joining the St. Louis office of The Associated Press in 1993, I had never been to Ferguson as a reporter.

On Aug. 9, I returned home from a bike ride to learn that a young black man had been fatally shot by a white Ferguson police officer. By that humid Saturday evening, hundreds of people were congregating near the scene where Michael Brown was killed by Darren Wilson. The crowd was angry. Some witnesses said the 18-year-old had his hands up in surrender when he was shot.

The next day, as Ferguson police prepared for a news conference to explain what happened, I was among a crowd of reporters who heard distant chanting. As I walked toward the noise, I could see in the distance hundreds of people, many holding signs. The chant soon became clear: “Hands up! Don’t shoot!”

That would become the rallying cry in the unrest that followed. It was also the first evidence that Ferguson would be a far bigger story than we initially imagined.



Shootings by police are not uncommon, a sad reality of urban life. In April last year, about four months before Brown died, a mentally ill man was shot in a Milwaukee park. A few days before, a man waving an air rifle was killed in an Ohio Wal-Mart by police.

So what was different in Ferguson? Brown and Wilson had their fatal encounter in the middle of a street surrounded by apartment buildings. It was almost noon on a Saturday, and many people — residents, construction workers, visitors — were outside.

Word quickly spread from witnesses who believed the shooting was unjustified, that Brown was trying to surrender. What we didn’t know at the time was the depth of mistrust between black residents and the predominantly white Ferguson Police Department, a level of suspicion that no doubt fueled what happened next.

On Sunday evening, thousands of people crowded the same street where Brown was killed for a vigil. The anger was evident, but the event was peaceful. Suddenly, a young woman came running: “They’re rioting on West Florissant.”

I ran the three blocks to the busy four-lane street lined with retail businesses. My attention was drawn to a large group of people cheering and yelling obscenities in the direction of a QuikTrip convenience store.

By the time I got there, it was on fire. People were running out, their arms full of stolen goods.



Never before had the anger been as intense in Ferguson. Young men began hurling bricks through store windows, kicking in doors, throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at police cars.

The destruction that night led police to adopt a tougher stance. By Monday, hundreds of officers in riot gear, some in armored trucks, lined the streets. Now police were becoming more aggressive. Some aimed their threats and angry words at protesters and journalists.

AP reporters, photographers and videographers from around the nation arrived, and the words and images we helped capture became part of the national debate about police interaction with black communities, the police response to protests and economic disparity between the races.

It was often harrowing work. Our journalists faced threats from protesters and police. Gas masks and bulletproof vests arrived, but many of us on the front lines of the riots felt the sting of tear gas when we failed to deploy the masks quickly enough.



The unrest lasted for months, worsened by a series of fatal police shootings in St. Louis. Most of the protests were nonviolent.

Meanwhile, local authorities had released virtually no information about when the grand jury considering potential charges for Wilson would render a final decision.

The announcement that Wilson would not be charged finally arrived on the evening of Nov. 24. The night produced striking visuals of buildings engulfed in flames and riot police massed under a “Season’s Greetings” banner.

The next morning, the AP team was back out on the streets of Ferguson as the National Guard rolled in and the community assessed the damage.

Ferguson became the impetus for a national movement. Soon, other fatal police encounters with black suspects drew similar scrutiny.

After Ferguson, old presumptions are gone and new questions asked. The events there intensified how the nation looks at law enforcement, the use of deadly force and the inflamed relations between blacks and American police.


 

Text from AP news story, Year later, AP reporter recalls origins of Ferguson movement, by Jim Salter.

 

Learn more about Deadly Force: Confrontations with the Police

 

Follow AP photographers and photo editors on Twitter: http://apne.ws/15Oo6jo

 

 

Spotlight is the blog of AP Images, the world’s largest collection of historical and contemporary photos. AP Images provides instant access to AP’s iconic photos and adds new content every minute of every day from every corner of the world, making it an essential source of photos and graphics for professional image buyers and commercial customers.  Whether your needs are for editorial, commercial, or personal use, AP Images has the content and the expert sales team to fulfill your image requirements. Visit apimages.com to learn more.

 

Written content on this site is not created by the editorial department of AP, unless otherwise noted. 

 

AP Images on Twitter | AP Images on Facebook | AP Images on Instagram

 

 

Published by AP Images Team

AP Images is the world’s largest collection of historical andcontemporary photos. AP Images provides instant access to AP's iconic photos and adds new content every minute of every day from every corner of the world, making it an essential source of photos and graphics for professional imagebuyers and commercial customers. Whether your needs are for editorial, commercial, or personal use, AP Images has the content and the expert sales team to fulfill your image requirements. Visit apimages.com to learn more.

4 thoughts on “A Year Later, AP Reporter Recalls Origins of Ferguson Movement

  1. Es inentendible, que un país como los EE.UU, donde siempre fue el abanderado de los derechos humanos, o al menos parecía, y los casos que había, eran casos aislados, pero hoy en día es casi cotidiano.
    No es solamente los casos raciales, también como el caso de la mujer que agredió verbalmente a una “latina”, por no hablar bien el ingles.
    Aunque eso también es una especie de segregación racial y de ignorancia, pues la “Sra.” alegaba que se fuera a su país “España”, porque “hablaba español”, harta cultura verdad???.
    Sin embargo, cuantos americanos saben, que el primer idioma, que se hablo en EE.UU. fue el español, y que la primera fundación de una ciudad o pueblo, lo hizo un español, que se llamo, Ponce de León, y que conquisto lo que hoy es el estado de la Florida. Es mas, la primera escuela que se fundo en los EE.UU. fue española y se instalo, en San Agustín, muy cerca de Orlando, yo he estado allí, y a tres cuadras, de esa escuela, hay una tremenda fortaleza, también construida por los Españoles,
    Así que eso de que en EE.UU. se habla “español” esta un poco fuera de lugar.-

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: